Thursday, January 27, 2011

A Call for Unity

Young People of US and UK,

I have noticed a harmful, divisive tendency to judge the merits of student and worker movements by comparing the relative conditions of countries. But to believe that citizens of a country are without grounds for protest, demonstration, or complaint simply because that unwanted direction or outcome is already the case in another country is no more than an exercise in relieving the guilt of being disconnected from real problems, occurring in real life, right now. This view is borne of cultural ignorance, brushing off the importance of cultural contextualization. The chain of "What are they complaining for, they don't have it nearly as bad as ______," when drawn to the extreme, would inevitably lead to the conclusion that no citizens of any country besides, say, the Congo, have a "right" to protest or demonstrate anything.

This letter is motivated primarily by recent demonstrations by UK students, protesting Parliament's vote to triple the university fee cap, following education spending cuts. I have found that many Americans, both students and non-students alike, when apprised of this political clash will scoff and deride UK students for complaining, because higher-education tuition has been astronomically high in the US for quite a long time already. But this view is not justified. From the fact that yearly fees for any decent US university range from $10,000 to $50,000 (and upwards in a few cases), it does not follow that UK students are unjustified in protesting the fee hikes they face, with the cap tripling from 3000 to 9000 (roughly $4,800 to $14,500). Being uncomfortable and/or reluctant to admit the dismal state of US higher education on the whole does not justify disparaging UK students for protesting fee hikes. Especially when it has much to do with the fact that these cuts are a direct result of the massive dematerialization of wealth effected by the finance and banking sector. Largely the US one at that. Now the people stuck footing the bill are the ones without lobbyists to take politicians out to lunch.

I argue here that students and others in the US should see that UK students have much to lose which Americans have already lost. There is a very strong, culturally ingrained belief in the UK that students' careers should not be limited by their parents' financial situation, obviously by no fault of the student. You cannot choose your parents. It is very surprising to me that Americans, who so proudly claim belief in the idea of a merit-based, earn-what-you've-worked-for system should deride UK students' call to action to ensure exactly that sort of system. There is no version of the "American dream" in the UK, the delusion that with "hard work" you can rise to the top, which in the US makes socioeconomically pre-screened students who might otherwise speak out reluctant to rock the proverbial boat. A moment's reflection on the staggering concentration of US wealth reveals that "dream" as complete fiction.

In the 21st century, in this new age of exponentially accelerating speed of information access, and vastly interconnected social webs, it makes no sense that young people stand on old nationalistic divides. US students should be rooting for students in the UK for carrying out things that would be impossible in the US. American students have lost the right to not graduate into a mountain of monetized debt. On top of that, the widespread use of employer-provided private health insurance has severely swayed the balance of power between employee and employer in the favor of the firm. So when faced with a distasteful or unjust policy enactment affecting them, a current or recently-graduated US university student will have to consider the immense risks posed by the possibility of getting fired for skipping work to protest or strike. Ability to pay off debt and health care are on the line. In other words: livelihood.

US students should root for the unarmed, unprotected UK students who have the courage to risk bludgeoning by riot police truncheons. Because in America, the police would draw guns instead of clubs. If the London protests I attended in December had instead taken place anywhere in America, many students would most certainly have been shot and killed. Take this from someone who was barely meters away from non-hostile females and secondary-schoolers being knocked unconscious by riot police going haywire. Just think how much more effort and intent to injure it takes to swing a club than to pull a trigger. It's a scary thought.

It is time for our young generation to dissolve generations-old traditions of nationalism. It is the first time in history workers and students have the ability to organize on a large scale and communicate amongst ourselves. It is the first time in history the voiceless have a voice, at least to communicate information amongst ourselves. The power is quite literally in our hands. This is the time to unite and root for the courageous young people everywhere, and not to preserve the crumbling establishment of old. The youth-led movements against authoritarian Arab regimes have drawn upon the power of online social networks to realize that other people feel the same way as they do, that other people want the change they do. The power to fight against being atomistically divided and conquered exists for the first time in history, and this real threat is the very reason the Egyptian regime just instructed internet and cellular providers to shut down service in the country. That is a disturbing outcome of concentration of political and corporate power, a trend that has also contaminated the economies of the US and the UK.

So I appeal to US students and citizens, root for students and workers in UK and elsewhere who are fighting for true freedom, not the freedom for the superrich to get superricher. And I appeal to UK students, especially those uncertain of the merits of this movement, to realize that this is a pivotal moment  for our generation, to join a global coalition of enlightened, informed, and impassioned young people who will not stand for the current system.

Another student demonstration against fee hikes will take place this Saturday in London. I would like ask my American friends reading this, as well as UK students unable to attend, to post here or email me with any questions you would like to ask of UK student demonstrators. I plan on conducting some short, filmed interviews with students at the protest, including (hopefully) organizers and leaders of the demonstration. I hope you will join me me in fostering a cross-continental, international understanding amongst our generation. This is our moment.

Very sincerely,
Keith Warren Binkly
k.binkly@lse.ac.uk

10 comments:

  1. Keith,

    i gotta say, at first I thought you were referencing the uprisings in Egypt, because of your last post on facebook. however, i think one of your key points remains: people have a right to work toward maintaining and improving their standard of living, and we commonly don't understand all of the circumstances surrounding their decision.

    best of luck in your interviews.

    that said, i don't agree with the throw-away comment, "a moment's reflection on the staggering concentration of US wealth reveals that "dream" as complete fiction." to me, it is a simplistic view of America in many ways.

    personally, i see the dream of America as the the chance everyone receives for upward movement. looking at a static image at one point in time of the distribution of wealth in America cannot reflect either the presence or lack of this class fluidity. studies are done on by sides to prove points, and you know as well as I do that often facts are at the mercy of the most eloquent person wielding them.

    i can only relate anecdotes that hint that the Dream is still alive here, in the US. for instance, the fact that I'm the first in my family to go to law school; as opposed to a story I heard that you have to be from the right family, with the right money, to consider being a doctor over there(i've only heard; you would know better, since you live there presently).

    right now, I know a security guard who is working graveyard shifts and going to school during the day to improve his job opportunities. at CES, I met a a bevy of hard-workers who had carved out places for themselves, including a fresh college graduate who had a business that sold iphone-compatible gloves.

    these interactions reinforce my opinion that the dream is alive and thriving in America. and I see it spreading, when hard workers from other countries come here just to get a taste of our engineering education, or when Boeing pays for its employees to get an MBA, without requiring that they even remain with the company. i wish i could go on, but i've forgotten more than i can relate.

    i bring in this tangent because i don't believe that America and the opportunities within need to be devalued in order to support UK students in their protest. granted, there are a lot of logistics in providing students with cheap education, including who ultimately will fund that education, what other programs will be cut, and policy decisions, but you're right, that doesn't mean that we can dismiss their concerns by simply calling them spoiled.

    the students planned education and their path in reliance on the government, and they have a right to be frustrated with the arbitrary decisions of an entity that, in many ways, can be only answerable to itself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anything you'd be interested in asking of UK students?

    And I'm using only the cross-sectional fact of extreme wealth concentration so as to not delve into empirical analysis, because this is decidedly not that type of thing. The wealth gap is also the most popular and poignant indicator of this problem for most people. I am aware that data over time is the relevant statistic, and the fact of the matter is that employment mobility is increasingly limited...over the past 30 years, its somewhere around 80% of wage growth has accrued to the top 5%, while median wage has stagnated and below average has drifted downward. We're at pre-depression levels of wealth inequality. The big ass feature article of the latest Economist is on how policy needs to effectively combat severely limited social mobility. A few anecdotes does not change economic reality, Kev-o.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keith,

    I wish I had a few for you, but I don't. I would be interested in the social background and goals of the students: what do they want to do, are they middle class, and do they prefer vanilla. You know, the basics, since I feel like that would help frame the debate.

    I just wanted to ensure that as you frame one issue, we don't assume others. anecdotes may not change things, but they can reflect certain things; economic reality is harder to discover than many pretend.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Keith, although I agree with your principle that everyone has the right to protest changes they don't approve of regardless of their standard of living, I'm not convinced that students inherently deserve cheap education. Running a University is expensive, and someone has to pay the bill.

    However, everyone does deserve access to education regardless of socioeconomic status. If I'm not mistaken, though, that is the situation we have here in the US. Sure we have ridiculous tuition rates, but the vast majority of colleges here offer full financial aid, even if you have absolutely no money. With all those loans, however, as you said, students graduate into a mountain of debt. And who is responsible for this debt? In the UK, the taxpayers were largely footing the bill. So the student has minimal debt and can, if they choose, waste their education on a low paying job that doesn't require too much work, because, well, college was hard and now they want to be less stressed, or whatever reason. In this scenario, the taxpayers have wasted their money on an education that went unused.

    On the other hand, if the student had all the debt upon graduation, they would have to get that high paying, high stress job they trained for in college. Once they finish paying off the debt, the job is paying even more and they get rich and provide a great service, and society benefits.

    I'm not saying that I am right and students are wrong for protesting, if I were in their shoes I would probably be doing the same thing. But I was just thinking about this today and how important incentives are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm sorry. But from the perspective of a UK student I think the idea that because tuition fees are lower we are some how unmotivated to go out and earn money, is utterly ridiculous. No one I know has come out of university and not wanted to get the best job they possibly could. The difference is merely that the motivation is shifted. It is no longer about paying off the huge debt fed to you by the system but it is now about working for your own quality of life. Furthermore, not having had to earn during university surely would make people more motivated to join the work force after graduation, not less.

    It is simply not the case that the tax payers are footing the bill for people to graduate and do nothing. The UK does produce highly qualified graduates. Maybe the profit margin for the state isn't quite as lucrative as it is over there, but education should never be about making a profit anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just because you don't personally know anyone who didn't want to get the best job they could, doesn't mean it never happens. My roommate is planning on taking a year off after graduation and maybe doing some tutoring for some money. And I know a guy who is about to get his PhD and does not want to work afterwards. People like that exist. Even if they are a small minority, it makes a difference.

    Being educated is receiving a service. That service costs money. Why should people not receiving said service be paying for it? An exchange of services for money should be about profit, that is how capitalism works.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You know, I heard that 20% of people that do acid go insane.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I heard 20% of the time you're a dick.

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://graphjam.memebase.com/2011/02/09/funny-graphs-clear-and-present-danger/

    I believe this graph supports my point.

    ReplyDelete